ZAM-coated solar ground mount structures in marine and arctic environments

Source: Liu Y., Gu T., Liu M., Wang Z., Cao G., Guo Q., Wang C. (2024). Corrosion mechanism of a high corrosion-resistance Zn. Al. Mg coating in typical extremely harsh marine and cold environments. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 33, 4290. 4302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.10.080. Open access, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.


ZAM (Zinc-Aluminum-Magnesium) alloy coating is now the default specification for solar mounting steel in C3. C5 corrosion environments. Lab data and accelerated salt spray tests tell one part of the story. This 2024 paper from the Corrosion Centre, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences tells another: what actually happens to a ZAM-coated steel panel over 24 months in two of the most severe real-world environments on record. A tropical marine coast and a sub-arctic city.

All data below is taken directly from the paper.


1. Test Material

The coating was produced by HBIS (Hebei Iron & Steel Group) using a hot-dip process on cold-rolled carbon steel sheet (SPCC substrate).

ParameterValue
Coating mass275 g/m²
Coating thickness~20 µm
SubstrateSPCC cold-rolled carbon steel
Phases presentZn-rich (η), binary Zn-MgZn₂ eutectic, ternary Zn-Al-MgZn₂ eutectic

2. Test Sites and Exposure Setup

Panels were mounted on racks at 45° tilt. One side facing the sky (skyward), the other facing the ground (field-ward). And exposed for 6, 12, and 24 months at both locations simultaneously.

SiteLocationClimate TypeConditions
WanningHainan Province, South China Sea coastHot tropical marineHigh temperature and humidity, significant chloride deposition from sea spray
MoheHeilongjiang Province, ~53°NExtremely cold urbanSub-arctic, winter temperatures to −40°C, low chloride, sulfate-dominated atmosphere

3. Mass Loss and Corrosion Rate. 24 Months

Figure 2: Mass loss and corrosion rate of ZAM coating at Wanning and Mohe over 24 months
Figure 2. (a) Cumulative mass loss (g/m²) and (b) annual corrosion rate (g/m²/a) of ZAM coating at Wanning (dark red) and Mohe (pink) over 6, 12, and 24 months of atmospheric exposure. Error bars from 4 parallel specimens. Liu et al. (2024), J. Mater. Res. Technol.

The Wanning site is substantially more corrosive. Mass loss at 24 months in Wanning is approximately 2.4× that of Mohe:

Site6 months (g/m²)12 months (g/m²)24 months (g/m²)
Wanning (marine)~4~12.5~24
Mohe (cold)~2~3.5~10

The corrosion rate curves are not monotonic. At Wanning, the rate peaks sharply at 12 months (~17 g/m²/a) before declining to ~11.5 g/m²/a at 24 months. This peak reflects the transition from rapid early corrosion of the MgZn₂ eutectic to formation of a stabilizing protective product layer. At Mohe, the rate dips at 12 months (~2.6 g/m²/a) then rises again to ~6.5 g/m²/a at 24 months. A different kinetic pattern linked to cold-climate electrochemical suppression and its eventual lifting as the protective layer matures.


4. Marine Atmosphere. Wanning

4.1 Surface Morphology (SEM)

Figure 3: Wanning SEM surface morphology skyward and field-ward at 6, 12, 24 months
Figure 3. SEM surface morphology of ZAM coating at Wanning. Skyward (a. C) and field-ward (d. F). After 6, 12, and 24 months. Scale bars: 100 µm (main), 10. 20 µm (insets). Yellow arrows indicate corrosion product accumulation and pitting progression. Liu et al. (2024).

At 6 months (skyward), the surface shows initial bright corrosion product deposits. By 12 months, granular crystalline particles cover more uniformly. By 24 months, a dense, cracked product layer has formed. On the field-ward side the progression is more aggressive: significant pitting visible at 6 months, with larger irregular particle clusters and deeper corrosion at 12 and 24 months.

4.2 Cross-Section: Where Corrosion Initiates and Propagates

Figure 4: Wanning SEM cross-section showing eutectic dissolution at 6, 12, 24 months
Figure 4. SEM cross-sections of ZAM coating at Wanning. Skyward (a. C) and field-ward (d. F). After 6, 12, and 24 months. Scale bars: 10 µm. Labels identify Zn-rich phase and ternary Zn-MgZn₂-Al eutectic. Yellow arrows indicate cracks; yellow ovals show internal crack propagation zones. Liu et al. (2024).

Corrosion initiates in the ternary eutectic phase (the MgZn₂-containing region) and propagates inward along the eutectic network toward the zinc-rich phase boundary. The Zn-rich dendritic phase is electrochemically noble and remains structurally intact for longer, serving as a scaffold while the eutectic is consumed. By 12 months (field-ward panel e), the paper identifies “preferential corrosion” of the eutectic phase with a clear pit at the eutectic-Zn-rich boundary. By 24 months, internal cracking and extensive void formation are visible within the coating.

4.3 Elemental Distribution. EDS Maps

EDS elemental maps Wanning ZAM coating skyward and field-ward showing Zn Al O S Cl distribution
Figure 5. EDS elemental maps (Zn, Al, O, S, Cl) of ZAM coating cross-sections at Wanning. (a) skyward, (b) field-ward. Scale bars: 10 µm. Yellow dashed lines outline regions of interest. Liu et al. (2024).

Key findings from the EDS maps:

  • Zn: Fills the bulk coating matrix (Zn-rich phase)
  • Al: Concentrated in large rounded grains (Al-rich phase within eutectic)
  • S: Present in matrix and surface pockets. SO₂-derived sulfate products
  • Cl: Concentrated in localized pockets near the outer surface, more pronounced field-ward. Signature of simonkolleite and chloride products from sea spray

The Cl concentration difference between skyward and field-ward is critical: the field-ward side accumulates chloride from surface runoff and retained moisture, driving faster eutectic dissolution.

4.4 XRD. Corrosion Product Identification

XRD patterns Wanning ZAM coating 6, 12, 24 months skyward and field-ward
Figure 6. XRD patterns of ZAM corrosion products at Wanning after 6, 12, and 24 months. Skyward (blue) and field-ward (black). 2θ range: 5°. 60°. Symbols identify phases including simonkolleite (α), zinc sodium chloride sulfate (ε), and zinc hydroxysulfate (β). Liu et al. (2024).

The XRD data identifies chloride-dominated corrosion products at Wanning, reflecting the marine atmosphere:

SymbolPhaseFormulaRole
αSimonkolleiteZn₅(OH)₈Cl₂·H₂OPrimary barrier. Dominant skyward at 24m
εZinc sodium chloride sulfateNaZn₄SO₄(OH)₆Cl·6H₂OEarly-forming product
βZinc hydroxysulfateZn₄SO₄(OH)₆·H₂OProtective, SO₂-derived
δGordaite-like phaseZn₄SO₄(OH)₆·5H₂OProminent skyward at 12m
γPentahydriteMgSO₄·5H₂OMg-derived from MgZn₂ dissolution
χZinc sulfate chloride hydroxideZn₁₂(SO₄)₃Cl₃(OH)₁₅·xH₂OField-ward, early formation

Simonkolleite (Zn₅(OH)₈Cl₂·H₂O) becomes dominant by 24 months on the skyward surface. It is a dense, low-solubility zinc hydroxide chloride that fills pits and micro-cracks, blocking further ingress. The Mg²⁺ released from MgZn₂ dissolution stabilizes this compound and also participates in forming MgAl-LDH (Mg₆Al₂(OH)₁₆CO₃·4H₂O) and ZnAl-LDH (Zn₂Al(OH)₆(CO₃)₀.₅·xH₂O). Layered double hydroxides with strong barrier properties.

4.5 Electrochemical Analysis. Polarization Resistance

EIS analysis quantifies the difference between skyward and field-ward protection at Wanning. The skyward side maintains 3. 6× higher polarization resistance (Rp) throughout the 24-month exposure:

Side6 months (kΩ·cm²)12 months (kΩ·cm²)24 months (kΩ·cm²)
Skyward~97~63~76
Field-ward~16~4~23

The skyward Rp arc diameter at 6 months is approximately 80 kΩ·cm² in the Nyquist plot, declining over time as the outer product layer gradually becomes more porous. The partial recovery at 24 months corresponds to stabilization of the simonkolleite barrier layer. Field-ward Rp drops to just 4 kΩ·cm² at 12 months. The lowest point in the dataset. Before partially recovering at 24 months.


5. Cold Urban Atmosphere. Mohe

5.1 Surface Morphology (SEM)

Mohe SEM surface morphology skyward and field-ward at 6, 12, 24 months
Figure 7. SEM surface morphology of ZAM coating at Mohe. Skyward (a. C) and field-ward (d. F). After 6, 12, and 24 months. Features: oxide film spalling (6m skyward), dendritic crack patterns (12m), crack dimensions at 24m (skyward: 10.95 µm × 0.83 µm; field-ward: 5.32 µm × 2.32 µm). Liu et al. (2024).

At Mohe, the degradation mode is localized pitting rather than the eutectic network dissolution seen at Wanning.

  • 6m skyward: Oxide film spalling. Localized detachment of the thin surface oxide
  • 12m skyward: Dendritic crystalline structures; linear cracks appear
  • 24m skyward: Prominent cracks at 10.95 µm × 0.83 µm
  • 12m field-ward: Dense particle clusters; inset reveals crack at 2 µm scale
  • 24m field-ward: Multiple elongated cracks at 5.32 µm × 2.32 µm

5.2 Cross-Section: Pit Dimensions Over Time

Mohe SEM cross-section with pit dimensions skyward and field-ward at 6, 12, 24 months
Figure 8. SEM cross-sections of ZAM coating at Mohe. Skyward (a. C) and field-ward (d. F). After 6, 12, and 24 months. Yellow arrows measure pit dimensions. White arrows identify coating phases (Zn-rich, binary Zn-MgZn₂, ternary eutectic). Scale bars: 10. 20 µm. Liu et al. (2024).

Pits form in the eutectic phase near the Zn-rich phase boundary. Measured dimensions:

ConditionPit width (µm)Pit depth (µm)
Skyward, 6m.Initial product layer: 0.25 µm
Skyward, 12m4.564.37
Skyward, 24m14.236.06
Field-ward, 12m3.836.51
Field-ward, 24m12.187.43

5.3 Pit Shape Analysis. Depth/Width Ratio (β)

Mohe pit dimensions depth width beta ratio bar chart at 12 and 24 months
Figure 9. Pit dimensions (depth, width in µm) and shape factor β (depth/width ratio) for ZAM coating at Mohe after 12 and 24 months, skyward (s) and field-ward (f). β > 1 indicates a pit deeper than wide. Horizontal line at β = 1.0 marks the transition. Liu et al. (2024).

The β (depth/width) ratio tracks whether pits are growing deeper (β > 1, penetrating) or broadening (β < 1, shallow):

ConditionDepth (µm)Width (µm)βShape
12m skyward~4.4~4.6~0.95Roughly equiaxed
12m field-ward~6.5~3.9~1.7Deep, narrow. Highest penetration risk
24m skyward~6.1~14.2~0.45Wide, shallow
24m field-ward~7.4~12.2~0.65Broader, less penetrating

The field-ward sample at 12 months has β = 1.7. Pits significantly deeper than wide. This is the highest substrate-penetration risk morphology in the dataset. By 24 months, all β values are below 1. The protective product layer has filled the pit bases and redirected attack laterally rather than vertically.

5.4 XRD. Corrosion Products at Mohe

XRD patterns Mohe ZAM coating 6, 12, 24 months skyward and field-ward
Figure 10. XRD patterns of ZAM corrosion products at Mohe after 6, 12, and 24 months. Skyward (red) and field-ward (blue). Identified phases: Zn, MgZn₂, Zn₄SO₄(OH)₆·4H₂O, ZnSO₄, Al₂O₃, AlOOH. No chloride compounds present. Liu et al. (2024).

Mohe’s corrosion products are sulfate-dominated with no chloride compounds. Consistent with an inland cold atmosphere:

PhaseFormulaFirst detected
Zinc (metallic)Zn6m (dominant throughout)
Magnesium zinc intermetallicMgZn₂6m; visible field-ward at 24m
Zinc hydroxysulfate hydrateZn₄SO₄(OH)₆·4H₂O12m
Zinc sulfateZnSO₄12m
Aluminium oxideAl₂O₃24m (skyward)
BoehmiteAlOOH24m (skyward)

The appearance of Al₂O₃ and AlOOH at 24 months indicates the Al-rich phase is contributing to product formation at cold temperatures. The absence of chloride compounds confirms the corrosion mechanism at Mohe is fundamentally sulfate-driven. Not chloride-driven. The aluminum oxides develop more slowly here than the LDH compounds seen in the marine case.

5.5 Electrochemical Analysis. Mohe

EIS Nyquist impedance magnitudes at Mohe are much smaller than at Wanning, reflecting lower overall corrosion activity in the cold environment. At 6 months, the skyward side shows a steep diagonal (diffusion-controlled, protective initial layer), while the field-ward side shows a small semicircle. At 12 months, the skyward arc grows substantially. The protective layer consolidating. By 24 months, both sides show a drastic reduction in impedance, consistent with the paper’s finding that after 24 months at Mohe, the two sides exhibit similar corrosion rates. Unlike the persistent divergence seen at Wanning.


6. Corrosion Mechanism

ZAM coating corrosion mechanism schematic diagram three stages
Figure 11. Schematic diagram of the atmospheric corrosion mechanism of Zn-Al-Mg coating. Three stages: (1) pristine coating; (2) thin liquid film, O₂ dissolves, Zn²⁺ and OH⁻ released, ZnO/Zn(OH)₂ nucleates; (3) atmospheric pollutants (Cl⁻, SO₄²⁻, CO₂) drive formation of simonkolleite, hydrozincite, and zinc hydroxysulfate. Liu et al. (2024).

The paper’s mechanism schematic shows three stages:

Stage 1. Pristine coating. Zn-rich phase (large dendrites), binary Zn-MgZn₂ eutectic (lamellar), and ternary Zn-Al-MgZn₂ eutectic (fine) on SPCC steel substrate. No corrosion product.

Stage 2. Thin liquid film. O₂ dissolves into the water film. MgZn₂ corrodes preferentially (least noble phase), releasing Mg²⁺ and Zn²⁺ ions. Primary products ZnO and Zn(OH)₂ nucleate on the surface.

Stage 3. Protective product formation. Atmospheric pollutants enter the film and react. Three key reactions produce the barrier layer:

  1. Zn(OH)₂ + 4Zn²⁺ + 6OH⁻ + 2Cl⁻ + H₂O → Zn₅(OH)₈Cl₂·H₂O (simonkolleite). The primary barrier in marine environments
  2. Zn(OH)₂ + 4Zn²⁺ + 4OH⁻ + 2CO₃²⁻ → Zn₅(OH)₆(CO₃)₂ (hydrozincite). Forms in both environments
  3. 3ZnO + Zn²⁺ + 7H₂O + SO₄²⁻ → Zn₄(SO₄)(OH)₆·4H₂O (zinc hydroxysulfate). Dominant in cold and inland environments

In the marine environment (Wanning), Cl⁻ drives reaction 1, producing dense simonkolleite that fills pits and cracks. In the cold environment (Mohe), CO₂ and SO₄²⁻ drive reactions 2 and 3, producing a similar barrier without the chloride reinforcement. Explaining why the pit shape factor at Mohe shows sharp β > 1 pits at 12 months before broadening to β < 1 at 24 months.


7. Full Comparison

ParameterMarine. WanningCold. Mohe
24-month mass loss~24 g/m²~10 g/m²
Peak corrosion rate~17 g/m²/a (at 12m)~6.5 g/m²/a (at 24m)
Primary corrosion modeEutectic network dissolutionLocalized pitting in eutectic
Pit shape at 12m field-wardInward propagation along eutecticSharp deep pits (β = 1.7)
Pit shape at 24mDense product layer formsPits broaden (β → 0.65)
Sky vs. field-ward rateSky < field-ward; diverges over timeSky < field-ward; converges at 24m
Dominant corrosion productsSimonkolleite (Cl-driven)Zinc hydroxysulfate (SO₄-driven)
Skyward Rp at 6m~97 kΩ·cm²High (diffusion-controlled)
Field-ward Rp at 6m~16 kΩ·cm²Low

8. What This Means for Solar Mounting Specification

Coating weight matters most in marine environments. At Wanning, 24-month mass loss is ~24 g/m² from a 275 g/m² coating. About 8.7% consumed in two years. In a 25-year asset life, higher initial coating weight (ZM310, nominally 310 g/m²) provides more sacrificial reserve. The accelerating rate at Wanning (peaking at 17 g/m²/a at 12 months) shows the first two years are the critical period before the protective layer stabilizes.

Field-facing surfaces are the weak point. The field-ward side consistently shows 3. 6× lower polarization resistance than the skyward side at Wanning, and consistently higher early corrosion rates at Mohe. For ground mount piles, the pile wall exposed to soil and splash is effectively the “field-ward” surface. The Rp data quantifies why drainage design and avoiding moisture-trapping section geometries matter for long-term durability.

Cold environments produce a different failure mode. At Mohe, the sharp pit morphology (β = 1.7) at 12 months is the highest substrate-penetration risk in the study. More localized and concentrated than the distributed eutectic dissolution at Wanning. For installations in sub-arctic or high-altitude conditions with freeze-thaw cycling, ZAM’s 141 HV hardness (vs. 64 HV for standard hot-dip galvanized) directly addresses coating delamination at stress concentration points.

The self-healing mechanism works in both environments. Both sites show pit broadening (β declining toward <1) between 12 and 24 months, confirming that the simonkolleite and zinc hydroxysulfate product layers form and redirect corrosion laterally. The mechanism functions in cold conditions. Just more slowly. The 24-month data confirms it works.


Source

Liu Y., Gu T., Liu M., Wang Z., Cao G., Guo Q., Wang C. (2024). Corrosion mechanism of a high corrosion-resistance Zn. Al. Mg coating in typical extremely harsh marine and cold environments. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, Vol. 33, pp. 4290. 4302. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.10.080. Published under Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Full paper available without subscription.

Figures reproduced under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 with attribution to the original authors.


Solaracks specifies ZAM alloy coating as the standard for ground mount racking, pile foundations, and cable tray systems in ISO corrosivity categories C3 and above. Contact our engineering team for coating grade recommendations by project location and exposure class.

Get an engineered mounting quote for your project.

Share drawings, module layout, site location, wind load, snow load and corrosion environment. Solaracks will recommend the system, material, layout and packing approach.

Request a quote